The finance layer for AI spend

Reconcile and forecast AI spend — no engineering required.

Every line of AI spend, integrated, tagged, and reconciled into reporting your board can read, your auditors can defend, and you can confidently forecast off of.

AI SPEND $2,412,847 ▲ 212% vs budget
  • ├─Model APIs · Anthropic$912,330eng/platform
  • ├─Model APIs · OpenAI$604,118eng/platform
  • ├─Embedded inference · Prod$371,205cogs/product
  • ├─Subscriptions · 47 seats$189,940opex/all-depts
  • ├─Fine-tuning & evals$141,022r&d
  • ├─Shadow spend · cards$112,480unallocated → tagged
  • └─Vector DB & retrieval$81,752cogs/product
RECONCILED $2,412,847

R&D credit eligible

Line 01 — The problem 1.7% OF REVENUE

2025 was tokenmaxxing. 2026 is the morning after.

Last year, the mandate was simple: spend more on AI, ship faster, ask questions later. This year the questions arrived. AI is now approaching 2% of revenue and doubling annually. It's scattered across API bills, usage-based product costs, seat licenses, and a credit-card layer nobody owns. And the model providers are raising prices and gating their all-you-can-eat tiers on the way to their IPOs. The line item is growing faster than anyone's ability to explain it.

5%

of CFOs have real-time, unified spend visibility

2.1×

projected growth in AI spend as a share of revenue, 2025→2026

212%

typical variance between AI budget and actual

Sources: Coupa Strategic CFO Report 2026; BCG executive survey, Jan 2026.

Line 02 — The gap Q∂ UNEXPLAINED

Engineering has dashboards. Finance has invoices. The board has questions.

Every tool that tracks AI cost today was built for the people generating the spend — traces, tokens, latency. None of it survives contact with a month-end close. Meanwhile the questions on the other side of the table are getting sharper: Where is the AI money going? What is it returning? What will it cost next quarter? "We'll get back to you" is not an answer that scales.

What engineering sees

tokens_in / tokens_out
p95 latency
retries: 3
cache hit ratio

What finance needs

COGS by product line
accrual by GL code
variance vs. forecast
unit economics per request
Line 03 — The product 4 OUTCOMES

The system of record for AI spend.

One integration layer across every source — model APIs, subscriptions, embedded inference, cards and procurement. Automated tagging to team, project, product, and GL code. Then the outputs no engineering tool will ever build.

Pillar 01 · Close

Close with confidence.

Every dollar of AI spend mapped, tagged, and reconciled — accrual-friendly, GL-coded, variance-explained. AI stops being the asterisk in your close and becomes a line item you can stand behind.

Model APIs · tagged ✓ reconciled
  • Model APIs$1,516,448
  • ├─In-product usage$1,011,200
  • └─Internal team usage$505,248
  • ├─Engineering$314,900
  • ├─Marketing$112,400
  • ├─Sales$52,300
  • └─Other$25,648
Pillar 02 · Forecast

Forecast what's coming.

Usage-based costs don't behave like seats. Model the things that actually move your number — provider price changes, tier restrictions, product-driven inference growth — and forecast under scenarios instead of finding out in the invoice.

Q3 forecast · scenarios
base price-hike growth
Pillar 03 · Recover

Recover what you're owed.

A meaningful share of your AI spend is R&D credit eligible — but only with substantiation. Arvata produces audit-ready documentation automatically, mapped to qualified research activities. For many customers, the recovered credit covers the product before it saves a single token.

R&D credit eligible
$964,000 eligible $135,000 credit

Mapped to qualified research activities, substantiation attached.

Pillar 04 · Optimize

Spend less without shipping less.

When the report finds the waste — bloated contexts, retry loops, oversized models — you're not handed a chart and a shrug. Arvata deployed engineers go in and cut spend 20–40% with quality benchmarked before and after. Finance gets the savings. Engineering gets finance off its back. Everyone keeps shipping.

Cost per request
$0.084 / req $0.051 / req

QUALITY: HELD ✓

Line 04 — Integrations ONE LAYER

One layer across every source of spend.

Read-only connections to where AI spend originates — and to the finance stack where it gets reported. No SDK, no proxy, no latency tax.

Spend sources
Finance stack

Don’t see your tools here? We’re constantly adding new integrations.

Line 05 — The close BALANCE: ✓

Close the books on AI spend.